Category: Blog

For sale now at: £7500.

Here at DuratecNC we love engines, engines is what we do best, engines at this level are what people can’t do themselves as they don’t have the knowledge, nor the equipment. Some think they can, but then you drive past them on the straight, it blows up or it doesn’t meet expectations. We can do other things, but then hey, so can you, or at least, some of you can. You can scrape rust off bodyshells and paint them, fit roll over bars, coilovers, anti-roll bars, uprated brakes, wheels, polish bodywork etc. If you can’t, we’ll do that for you too, no problem.

So it made sense to me to put together a cheap car that had a highly modified, dyno proven great engine in it which you could buy, take it away and do what you wanted with it. The car could be test driven, bought, driven home. Developed further to make it into a proper track weapon or simply take the engine out and put it in your own car. Want just the engine? No problem, we’ll drop it out for you – take £1000 off the total price and it’s yours.

The word to use with this car and engine is ‘Potential’. The engine is restricted to the current output by the inlet manifold, the spec of the engine is track focussed and with the addition of ITBs will do circa 250 – 260 bhp. But then again, don’t fall into the usual trap of thinking ‘max bhp’ is all that counts, it certainly is not and 10 minutes driving this will assure you of that too. Overtaking has never been so easy, you don’t even need to use all of the 7000 rpm available or drop it down to the lowest gear possible. The low and mid-range torque mean you can make devastating overtake manoeuvres using between two and 5000 rpm only. Want to do more? Just hang on and it’ll pull hard right up the redline.

The 225bhp 2.5 will absolutely annihilate a 225bhp 2 litre anywhere and at anytime because of the huge difference in torque.

It’s an 07 NC which originally had a 1.8 in it, 77600 on the clock. When the engine was changed the ECU and clocks were changed to those from a 2.0 and the mileage on those was 67200.

Underneath it’s solid, with some surface rust here an there. The O/S cill and inner wheel arch area to the rear has been completely cut out and replaced (by me) so it’s been done properly. Painted and anti-stonechipped, wax injected in that area. Both cills were injected too. The rear and fronts of the cills had all surface rust ground off then coated with Rustbuster Epoxy (one of the best treatments around). It’ll be a few years before anything needs doing to the chassis.

Whilst the front subframe was off all the suspension bolts were removed, greased and put back in. Don’t underestimate the importance of this if it (the suspension) is to be overhauled at a later date as it’s a bugger of a job when the bolts are rusted in. It often includes the cutting off of suspension arms or complete removal of subframe and suspension. Not now, everything will come off like it did when new.

Rear sub is something else, never touched it so do with it what you will or pay us to sort it, but at least it’s easy to drop.

Exhaust system is stock, but had a de-cat. The manifold is an ILMotorsport one. This is available by separate negotiation. A larger bore manifold (known as a 1.8″) is available elsewhere and would release a few more horses too. This car will pass an emissions test with the centre cat fitted.

Upper bodywork shows no rust apart from one rear arch which has a patch right at the top and a small part of the lip underneath has come off. Otherwise it’s what’s to be expected from a 2007 daily used car. Hood is fine, clean, no leaks.

Suspension: Std dampers with H&R lowering springs.

Brakes work ok. Discs a bit worn, but calipers look they’ve had some attention or replacement recently, are all free and not seized.

Interior is stock, cloth seats, nothing much to report, but it does have some kind of Bluetooth fitted throughout. No leaks. Windblocker hinges have been snapped off, but if you want a replacement it’s no problem. Comes with a new and fully working oil pressure gauge, if you’re looking at that wondering what it means read the blog and the gauges for sale page.

So onto the best bit; the engine.

This is not a mild workover by some bloke in a shed, this is a properly built high end Duratec build. It’s designed to be used hard and on track.

It started off as a low mileage 2.5 which was stripped, cleaned and inspected and the following parts were thrown out: Pistons, conrods, bearings, balance shaft cartridge, sump.

The block was bored with a deckplate to suit new forged and lightened over-sized pistons, CR 12.5:1. New forged steel rods, DuratecNC St3 cams. Mild porting to head, valves and seats re-cut, lapped in. High lift, high RPM race valve springs.

All gaskets, seals, bearings replaced (including pulley bearings at front of engine) Crankshaft balanced and keyed, 550 injectors. Runs on 99 Ron, VVT is operational, fully and expertly remapped Mazda ECU.

Running bigger injectors gives you the headroom for other mods (ITBs) without finding bigger injectors. Putting both a bigger and completely different specification engine in with much larger injectors requires a calculation doing and applying to the ECU so it will run (this is in addition to the mapping which comes afterwards). This has been done which is why it drives at least as well as a standard road car.

A stock 1.8 makes 124 bhp and 123 ft/lbs. 2.0 produces 158bhp & 139 ft/lbs torque

Output of this 2.5 is now at approx 100bhp and 82ft/lbs more than the car had originally at nearly 225bhp and 205 ft/lbs of torque:  Which is actually being held back by the original intake manifold. Stick some ITBs on to make approx 250 – 260 BHP (it’s dependent on how big the ITBs are) and you’ll have one of the quickest naturally aspirated NC in the UK. That’s more than a supercharged one! It’ll rev safely to 7500 and as it stands is devastatingly quick, 60 comes up in around 5 seconds now yet it looks completely stock under the bonnet.

I built the engine with the intention of it being a full on track weapon which it is, but it’s also so easy to drive it would actually make a great road car. It’ll pootle along lazily at 1 – 2000 rpm in a high gear, but drop it down and it’ll pull hard until right off the end of the rev counter. It does pull like a train, I really can’t say how much I am impressed with it and i’m sure you will be too if you’re looking for a very capable N/A engine. Because it’s overall efficiency has been raised it also returns good MPG on the road.

The engine has only about 200 miles of road use since being built, it has done no trackdays.

Comes with MOT until Dec 2021. This car will pass an emissions test with the centre cat fitted.

Has not been declared to DVLA as an engine change as yet.

How the price breaks down:

Engine £6150

Car £1000

Removal and refitting of engines, mapping, development work, transport, welding, MOT: £2000

Total £9000

Total asking price £7500

Graph below is BHP at the wheels, not at the fly which is nearly 225.

 
So do with it what you will, improve the rest of the car to suit the engine or simply take the engine out and put it in another car, put your old engine back in this and sell it on. If you want the engine taking out and sending then there will be an extra charge for this.
This engine would benefit massively from ITBs as the original manifold is holding it back, estimate another 30 bhp on top of what it already has.

Because of our honesty don’t expect to turn up to haggle much as you’ll find you have no reason to, it is what it is.
Don’t just join in a track day to keep up with all the other naturally aspirated MX-5s, set out to rub their noses into the tarmac and laugh like a lunatic 🙂

Want an engine to this exact spec supplied and built? £6150 including map. 

Associated Blog entries linked to this article:

More of a technical overview of what was done to the engine: http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?p=823

Why an N/A?  http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?p=214

Don’t know anything about the MX5 NC? http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?p=52
Technical aspect of the 2.5: http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?p=180
Cheap trackday car, why? http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?p=369

Quality, you get what you pay for. Sorry, not the most exciting of posts, but if you’re thinking of buying an engine from here then…

This is about why and what goes into a full professional build. Here is an explanation, starting at the top of the engine and working our way down.

Dipsticks. There is a lot of confusion over dipsticks, not only on stock 2.0 (see appropriate blog), but even more so when a swap is done. I either use a 2.3, 2.5 or a 2.0 cam cover, whichever I have an excess of or is easiest/best condition. The length of the new dipstick/camcover combo is checked against the original so the max level remains correct. Simple isn’t it? Yes. I don’t know why so many get their pants tied in a knot over it. If you buy an engine from me you can be sure it was considered and something done about it, no guesswork was involved or asking people on FB and getting 72 different replies, none of which can be substantiated. Or even worse, running low on oil on track!

Injectors.

If the engine is built with high power in mind then it really does pay to upgrade to larger injectors early on. What I mean by that is the originals will cope ok up to about 230bhp, but will be flat out at that with no room for power related upgrades (such as ITBs). We generally fit new Bosch 550s.

This is mainly due to the fact we are using the factory ECU. You need to tell the ECU that the engine size has gone up and also the injectors, once you’ve done that it’ll perform much better (the engine will act like a standard one at low rpm, idle, cruise etc), you need certain Ecutek permissions to do this so it will already have been done when you buy and engine & ECU combination from us.

Cylinder head.

Is completely stripped, cleaned and assessed. I have the tools and knowledge to check for wear in the various moving parts. If new valves aren’t fitted then the old ones are always cleaned up as new, seat face recut and an extra angle put on to aid flow.

What is done to the ports is obviously down to the spec of the whole build, but again I have the wherewithall to improve the flow quite easily so quite often a mild job is enough. Valve seats are always recut. EGR passageways are blocked off.

When cams are fitted I never rely on the slots at the end and always use a dial gauge to check lift at TDC. You really need to have some figures to work from and can never trust with 100% the cam manufacturer got it right.

Pistons. Pretty rare I use the orginals unless asked to do so or on a budget build. Mainly because the compression ratio is too low. Whilst putting a bigger cam in a std CR engine will see some kind of positive result, matching a big cam with high CR is a marriage made in heaven. This isn’t the time nor place to go into this extensively as it’s really an item all of it’s own, but doing it the proper way will not only make more power and torque (at every single RPM) it’ll also see better MPG.

Rods. For the price you can get a decent set of forged ones for it just is not worth using the originals. The engine is in bits in front of me so the labour factor is zero.

Crank: Gets cleaned, polished and oilways modified for improved oiling. The jury is out on the effects of removing the BS ring gear. The pulleys on an MZR/Duratec engine are of the floating variety, that is they have no keyways to locate them, you can spin them round and only the end bolt and often a diamond washer hold them from moving. This is ok for the cam sprockets, but the pulley on the crankshaft is known to move under duress. We therefore key the pulley to the crank to stop this. It also means taking it off (especially whilst in the car) is a lot easier. If it does move pistons will hit valves

The block gets a cleanand check like everything else and any unwanted holes blocked up. You can buy kits to do this, but as I have the equipment in the shop to do it quickly and properly there would be no point to buy something which is aimed at a DIYer with no tools.Some time and money saved there.

The bores are often re-bored and honed, if they are then a deckplate is used. This allows me to run the piston to bore clearance really tight. Less piston rock, no piston slap (a knocking noise when cold) and more power, less wear due to components fitting together properly.

The tumble flaps are removed and the housing gently blended in internally to aid air flow.

I think that about sums up a full build, it’s always good to know what you’re getting for your money.

This has always been a hot topic with any marque of car, not least of all the MX5 market.

The other day we did a panel air filter test. By this I mean we swapped out just the filter element itself inside the original airbox. I’m going to call the original style of filter ‘Paper’ I’m not sure they are made of paper these days looking at them, but we’ll stick with that.

A little bit about chassis dynos

A chassis dyno is basically a tuning tool, it’s for tuning or remapping cars. You cannot take a car from one dyno to another and expect the same figure, end of story. Some dynos don’t even give the same power/curve shape as others, nothing like on some! You’ll see in the pics below that the same car run over and over again gave a different figure everytime. That’s because things are constantly changing within the car. The first run is always the lowest, the second will make more power after that it can be up and down and all over. The reason for this is that many items are heating up and cooling down. Friction (and also intake air if it’s a turbo car) therefore changes throughout. Changes which alter the power output (due to temperature) are tyres, diff (oil), gearbox (oil), driveshaft CV joints (grease), intercooler on a turbo car and of course engine temps – the temperature of the actual parts, the oil and the water and the intake air perhaps. Some things get more efficient as they get warmer, some not, all have a peak operating temperature which you can not reach, or exceed.

Did you know (all things being equal) that an engine with a plastic intake manifold will make more power than one with an aluminium one? It will and the reason is plastic doesn’t conduct heat very well so it doesn’t get hot from being bolted to the engine, therefore it doesn’t transfer unwanted heat to the intake air.

If the Dyno has ‘calculated’ power at the flywheel for the graph then things get even worse! Dynos guesstimate (sorry for our overseas readers there) the power at the flywheel using the figure taken from the wheels. They all use a different method to do this so whilst the Wheel HorsePower figure will be a little different from one dyno to another, the Flywheel Horse Power will be even less accurate, often some 5 to 10%. The Americans are better at this as they usually quote WHP not FWHP. The only issue with that is an engine will show a different figure at the wheels depending on whether it is FWD, RWD or 4WD, but then as we learned from above, you wouldn’t sensibly compare them anyhow.

The reason for that ^ little diversion is that you have to be very careful of what you read when people post up dyno results. If they’re from different dynos, or even the same dyno, but with some time lapsed between runs the figures will be less than accurate. Cheap bolt-ons like air filters show very small results anyhow so these results can be mixed up with, or even overshadowed by other changes which are happening all the time .

I have never tested an MX5 with one of those snorkel type replacement air intakes, you know the type. The airbox is completely removed and a length of pipe put in place leading to the front area of the car with a filter on the end. I am extremely suspicious of the figures bandied around as they seem to rewrite the laws of physics. Now if you were to do a test on such a type you would need to do what we did and do multiple runs, all one straight after the other. Therein lies a potential issue with testing these type, you would have to have pre-rehearsed how to change from one to another so you could do it really quickly. If a lot of time had gone by whilst you undid everything then some accuracy will be lost. I know that actually fitting them requires taking the front off the car to get it in.

You will have seen these K&N panel filter copies for sale here and there, mainly on FB. The vendors claim a power increase. Someone also incorrectly independently tested one. They took out a USED paper filter and replaced it with a NEW ‘uprated’ panel filter. They did one run and it showed a gain. Well no surprise, taking a dirty filter out and replacing it with a clean one gave a better result.

So anyway, onto our little test. We aquired one of these things and a brand new paper one too.

The car was a 2006 with a BBR 200 in it, power output as you can see was hovering around 200bhp.

6 runs were done overall, the first three were with the aftermarket filter in (Filter 1). The car was then stopped for no longer than a few short minutes whilst the paper one (Filter 2) was put in as quickly as possible. 3 more runs were done.

An average was then taken of the 3 runs to give wheel horsepower figures:

Paper averaged out at 149 WHP

Aftermarket 143.8 WHP

So an average loss of 5.2 WHP torque similarly lost 5.2 Nm

With a paper filter the car more or less matched BBRs figures.

Previous to that test we did another on a different dyno, it showed a loss too, It was done the other way around, paper in first then aftermarket after that. I honestly didn’t believe it hence us doing it again on a different dyno.

Don’t believe any of this tripe about the engine learning how to cope with this new found airflow, if there is more air available it’ll show as a power increase immediately. We don’t remap cars and wait a week for it to catch up and show a power increase.

I would guess that (or I would hope!) the aftermarket may outflow the paper after both have done 10 thousand miles or so and got some dirt in them. That would be a difficult test to do accurately. Mind you, with the size of the holes in an aftermarket filter it’ll let a lot of dirt through in the meantime.

A short blog on these as many people don’t seem to know the facts, as the supplier of these to MX5parts I do 🙂

The problem we are fixing arose because the original 6 speed plastic bush doesn’t fit very well. It never did, right from new. It doesn’t wear out, it just never fitted properly. The NC1 ‘box has a different size bush to the NC2/3 type, if you look carefully at the picture you can see the difference.

Originally I got a fellow enthusiast (thanks Archie) to check out the 5 speed bush to see if the same applied, I sent some precise measuring equipment and he advised it fits perfectly. Since then I checked a few more and can confirm it doesn’t wear and does fit fine.

So to sum up; buy a bush for a 6 speed to make those changes more precise, don’t waste your money on a 5 speed one. Buy from MX5parts or me to be assured absolute precision and quality, buy elsewhere for questionable quality – you won’t know the difference as you can’t measure it. I only know it can be made worse, not better, as the ones we sell are a perfect fit.

Where does it go? It goes here:

Tips for fitting: There are plenty of online guides, Youtube etc. One thing I would add is put the new bush on your finger and drop or push it into the hole in the turret. As it’s a very precise fit you may need to rock it around a bit before it slides in. Then put the lever ball into it. Don’t drop it into the turret elsewhere! You’ll spend ages with a piece of bent wire trying to find it. Don’t ask me how I know this.

There is also mucho confusion about turret oil. It is separate from the main gearbox. It needs nothing more than the same oil you put into the gearbox. I would just put enough in to cover the moving parts you can see, no more. There is no reason to put special magic fairy tears £50/litre oil in there. All that lives in there is a few levers and joints, nothing high tech or rotating.

Is your 6spd gearbox notchy and difficult when cold, but ok when warm? This bush will not cure this problem, it’s something else.

We have our own blended oil for this problem you can read about it here: http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?page_id=348

The 5spd is less prone to this problem, but this oil will work in that too if you want to make it even smoother when cold.

This is just a gentle natter on trackdays and track cars in general, how Hitler performed on his maiden voyage and of course the MX5 NC.

Back in 2019 a few of us met up for an evening session at Donington, I love Donington and always have, it’s a fantastic place, it used to be Britain F1 GP venue at one time and is steeped in history. It also faced closure and was indeed closed for some time in recent years, but is now back as it should be.

It has everything you want from a track, a long straight, high speed S bends, hairpins, chicane, double apex corner uphill section, downhill section, loads of run-off, pit garages (i’m not sure if they are free now like they used to be). Craner is the bit people usually talk about as it’s a proper heart in mouth, grit your teeth, foot to the boards and hang on for dear life kind of section! It’s a downhill stretched out S and IIRC is a bit off camber too which means when you’re flat out you can feel the back going a little light and squirming as it nears the limits. If you’ve never driven at Donny it must go on your bucket list.

Sadly as it was the day before a Caterham race many of them had booked on to test their cars and skills to the limits along with us. So we had hardened racers on the track with novices; bad idea. It was like holding an F1 race on the same track as a saloon car race.

You had people overtaking wherever they wanted as if in a race, on the left, the right, mid bend, you name it. As if that wasn’t bad enough one of them stuck it in the gravel every few laps closing the track down time and time again. The session ended earlier than advertised and unsurprisingly on an already red flagged and closed track. We’d done something like 40 miles and used less than 1/4 of a tank! We had travelled for two hours to get there, one of my mates James had done about 4hrs I think from the deep South for that amount of driving. It was a complete and utter waste of time and money.

I don’t know whether TD organisers have lists of who is going and in what anymore, MOT certainly don’t. It was a great idea as obviously you could see in advance what kind of day it was going to be, maybe see cars and people who you’d like to go up against and have a chat with.

I felt saddened and embarrassed for my friends, also cross that i’d put so much time into getting the car ready for this. I complained to the organisers who took the time to explain their position in detail and was offered a ‘freebie’ at Blyton in Spring. This was then cancelled due to the CV19 outbreak, then as things calmed down a bit another one was allowed to take place in June.

Project Hitler 2.3 was nearing completion so it was a good time for a shake down and see what the Winters work had brought about. CV19 has set us back something like 6 months, not only because of the complete closure of many businesses, but also the supply chain being interrupted and now a huge backlog of things has backed up to be cleared. It’s been difficult to get dyno time, my local friend who helps with mapping on the road went abroad and got stranded, then decided not to come back for a while anyhow! All in all it’s been a difficult time for many people.

I already have a ‘winning formula’ to work from as far as suspension and set up is concerned so knew that would be ok, but it was on different tyres, wheels, brakes and of course a new 2.3 engine. The engine hasn’t been fully dialled in yet nor is mapping complete, but it was good enough and safe to drive it.

I’d built a big bore exhaust and put a Cobra Race back box on, whilst it sounded fantastic with lots of burble, pops and crackles, it was also very loud, the driveby at Blyton is 95Db at 20m. I’d bought a quite professional Db meter, (all the way from China for a tenner! ) and we tested Hitler at 105 at max rpm. One thing you can’t really do is change an exhaust system at the track side and given it had two tail pipes, two push in ’emergency’ Supertrapp style things were far too much money. There was no room underneath for anymore silencers, Cobra had no road silencers in stock for weeks and I was running out of time and ideas. In the end I was forced to put a standard (apart from a de-cat) system on so it lost a few bhp and sounded like an angry wasp in a tin, pausing to fart every now and again. Nevermind, it would have to do, I couldn’t risk being sent home. I’ll work on a solution to this, probably just a Cobra road back-box will do the job coupled up to the big bore mid section.

I’d obtained some 17 x 8 Enkeis with a good offset, painted them the usual trademark satin black and shod them with some NS2Rs. When they weren’t quite up to temp it was quite easy to powerslide out of the chicane with the torque of the 2.3, once warmed up you could throw the thing about however you wanted as per usual. To me this is what a properly set up MX5 is all about, you can head off to the track with your mates or your family and put anyone (within TD rules) in there. Your mates, the kids, your granny, wife, whatever. Send them out and they’ll be able to drive it to their maximum ability. You can push the thing as hard as you want and it doesn’t bite like some cars do. There is so much communication from it it’s amazing and I’ve tried really hard to keep it neutral, overcook it on a bend and it’ll just four wheel drift.

I wouldn’t have said there was much in the way of serious MX5 competition for Hitler out there that day, just some mildly modded road and race cars so it was easy to reel them in and dispose of with ease. It certainly wasn’t down to my skills as i’m no driving God, so with the right person behind the wheel it would be quite a weapon.

It’s got SRF fluid in and a big brake kit on which had some Mintex pads already included, also larger dimpled and grooved Mtec discs, vented all round. I looked up the part numbers for the pads and they didn’t look to be anything special (definitely not the 1171). They felt a bit wooden on the roads when cold, needing a bit of heat in them before they worked. I figured i’d give them a go as they were, but took some Stoptech fronts with me just in case.

They clearly hadn’t had any hard use or bedding in procedure done as the nature of them changed with the hard use I was giving them. At first they smelled as hard used pads generally do (at least, I think they were mine I could smell!), then developed a really loud squeal as some track pads often do. I wondered at first if they were going to give up on me, but despite the smell and noise performed well. This is the thing about using a bigger disc and pad, you can get away with using a softer pad. On the other track car the discs and pads are so big it uses nothing but road grade, yet you can stand on the brakes time after time from 100+ and it doesn’t struggle in the slightest, the discs don’t warp, go blue or whatever and you get good feel and bite from cold.

Whilst PJ is built on a cheap base it’s undoubtedly quick, also it’s still sensible and easy to drive on track being an NA engine. I do have a history of going insanely quick in stupidly cheap, but chronically powerful cars. I have a liking for street sleepers. There is something very satisfying about blowing away an expensive car in something which looks like a piece of shit. The thing is (and it’s mentioned in another blog) if you end up in a wall then you haven’t lost much, if it’s not a HUGE accident then your go-faster goodies (and your good self) may survive and be bolted back onto another car.

This is Project sausage, it was the most powerful 16v turbo Fiat Coupe the UK has ever had:

I was back then developing parts for integrales and the Coupe 16vt shared the same engine. integrales are expensive, Coupes are cheap as chips so one was found locally for about £400. If any engine bits were created which weren’t quite up to scratch or needed testing then they were bolted onto Project sausage. Sausages are known as the butchers friend, made up from floor sweepings, but still a fine piece of food when you’re in a rush.

PS put out just over 500bhp on an honest dyno, it was FWD, had a very basic cast iron swing arm suspension, coilovers, big brakes and thicker ARBs to cure its tendency to understeer. It was properly evil. You had to commit to a corner and keep your clog buried in the carpet, back off midway and you’d find yourself pointing the wrong way in a split second. Lift-off-oversteer in large quantities.

It was a good straight liner once on the move, but would spin the wheels in first and second if you had a heavy foot until it was hooked up to third. It had so much power going through the front wheels it was like watching a little old lady being pulled up the road by a Rottweiler, it would weave from side to side as you hung onto the steering wheel whilst the scenery flashed past at comical speeds. It totally slayed many expensive motors, mainly on the motorway, BMW M3s were just breakfast for Project Sausage.

I remember driving along a local bypass one night on my way home, some guy in an Astra VXR was all over my tail wanting some, aggressive driving, weaving all over, pulling up to my rear bumper etc. I knew what he’d do and I also knew there was a long clear straight coming up where he’d do it. So I shifted down a gear and held it at 3k whilst looking all innocent. Right on cue he dropped a cog and made his move.

So did I 🙂 The loud pedal got pushed into the mucky old carpet and he got as far as drawing alongside before the GT30 got into it’s stride. That was it, he appeared to go backwards at a rapid rate. Bye bye matey boy and I just hung onto the wheel whilst PS did it’s party trick. 3 seconds later I changed up and cruised along grinning at the spec floundering in my rear view mirror about 1/4 of a mile away. Some kid learned a valuable lesson that night that things aren’t always what they seem 😉

Anyhow I digress, we aren’t really here to talk about rusty old Fiats. Just rusty old Mazdas. So all in all Hitler 2.3 proved to be all we needed; fast, great handling and reliable, the extended redline up to 8k is a big help in the corners along with a powerband starting at 4k.

Whilst Blyton is cheap and great for the beginner or testing it gets a bit boring for me after a while. The heavens then opened at about 2 and quite a few people had gone home for a variety of reasons so we packed and left too. Job done.

It’s a shame there aren’t many (if any) photographers at trackdays anymore, even if you’ve got friends with cameras you can’t get to any good vantage points to get the best shots (check out the wire fencing on the pic right at the top there), especially at Blyton.

Next I will tweak the cam timing as I think there is a little more to come from this combination, then we’ll finish off the mapping, write an article outlining what’s all about, then it’s for sale.

This is a blog of my personal opinion based on my experience as to whether you should join the 5% elite and have a 100% track focused car or do the usual thing and drive a compromise car. As i’m of a certain age I’ve owned and driven them all from being a teenager to where I am now. It seems quite obvious to me, yet not a lot of people seem to get it, or think it doesn’t apply to them, or indeed just don’t have the space or plain can’t afford it. Nothing wrong with the last reason there of course.

The article is mainly based upon N/A cars, not so much ones with forced induction, the differences on those have already been discussed in another blog, although a lot of what is written does apply to both. There are three basic types of car discussed here with their abbreviations: Road car (RC), track car (TC) and the combined road & track car (R&T car)

In a Ratneresque (you might have to look that one up, lol Google ‘Gerald Ratner’) I’m going to say I have a dislike of combined road and track cars! I’m sorry all you 95 percenters and I know it’s mainly down to money, but I just do.

It’s largely to do with age and money of course, maybe your job too, but I’m lucky that I qualify for a track car, I have what is needed and I understand that others don’t have what I have, here is what you’ll need:

• A suitable vehicle to tow your track car with and appropriate driving licence privileges (I have a van for work purposes).
• A trailer and somewhere to keep it (I have a spare bit of land).
• A garage perhaps to keep your track car in and work on it (I’m lucky enough to have one).

The advantages of a standard or mildy modded road car is that they are comfortable, reliable, cost effective and good on fuel.

At the moment I can only think of one advantage to owning a combined R&T car and that is you can legally road test it or take it to the dyno, maybe for the occasional Saturday morning blat around your favourite roads, do some illegal and dangerous speeds, maybe have an accident if that’s your thing.

The advantages of a track only car:

• It won’t cost you any money whilst its stood, no MOT, no Tax or even insurance (the last one is debatable, but I don’t bother).
• If it’s kept in a dry garage it won’t have ongoing rust issues, you can buy an old car, fix any problem areas and it won’t reoccur or get worse. Not only the bodywork & chassis, but a car stored outside for long lengths of time, particularly in Winter will suffer from the brakes corroding and potentially seizing and corrosion to any other metal parts.
• If you’re working on it you won’t need to rush the job so the car can get you to work on Monday morning!
• My track car has no cloth roof, just a removable (lift off) hard top, this would be a pain in Summer as a daily drive.
• You don’t have to worry about having a working and legal car to get home in. Sometimes track cars break down at the track, they also wear their tyres down rapidly, often to the cords.

Disadvantages of using a track car as a daily drive:

• Whilst it will be fun for the first half hour it’ll soon wear off! Track cars are tiresome to drive on the road, the older you are, the worse it gets. Stiff and noisy suspension (bushes and dampers), firm noisy tyres, noisy exhaust, bucket seats, harnesses are all a major PITA when off track.
• Dangerous, noisy or tricky to drive: Semi slick tyres, track based geometry, safety features which no longer work (ABS, air bags, seatbelt pre-tensioners, stripped out interiors, cages etc)
• You’ll need a cat to pass a legal MOT, track cars don’t require cats.
• It’ll scrape, bang and damage itself over every speed hump and pothole. The underside will get damaged, wheels crack and buckle, front splitters ripped off in standing water or speedhumps, certain air intakes will drag in deeper standing water and destroy the engine.

To sum up and put it quite bluntly a well sorted and driven track focused car will perform well on track and you’ll be going quicker than many of them out there. Likewise a properly sorted road car will perform well on the road to get you there safely and in a dignified manner.

Neither one of the above will do each others job as well, a compromise R&T car will also do neither of these properly, you’ll be overtaken on track, on the road and by and large be irritating and disappointing whilst attempting either.

This article is for the hardcore enthusiast, if you’re Mr or Mrs 2006 100k miles ‘I’m not spending that much on a £xxxx car!’ you’re probably best off not knowing what is written below.

If you’re looking for suspension settings this isn’t really the place either, they are a very individual and personal thing so I apply whatever is needed to the car after a chat with the client and their proposed use. What different settings do and what to use is easily found on the internet already. This article aims to show you some things maybe you never knew about your NC because they are hidden right under there where I tend to work, we’ll discuss the pitfalls, what to watch out for, why not to bother and the actual mechanics of it.

One of the main attributes of an MX5 is the handling and they did of course handle superbly when they left the factory many years ago. If this is why you bought one you need to know that if it’s your typical ’06 with 100k on the clock it won’t be handling as well as it did due to much of it being worn out. .

• 

• 

Anti-roll bar links are known for wearing out and causing a knock or rattle over the bumps, this is also an MOT failure. They are relatively easy and cheap to replace, just be warned you will quite likely have to resort to cutting them off with a grinder or splitting the nut as they just spin round internally when the nut is turned. It is worthwhile putting an allen key in the cleaned out end there and trying it with a spanner first, you never know, miracles do happen sometimes.

• 

• 

The rear bush moves to control castor, front one camber and (age and use dependent) the through bolt is quite often seized in there as you can see.

What happens is water (sometimes salty of course) sits on the top of the subframe and runs down into the joint where it sits there doing it’s stuff. On a similar note it also gets into the subrames themselves and their mountings, it’s quite common to drop one down and get showered with rusty water or have it running down your arm. The subrame mounting nuts and bolts themselves (exposed as they are) are actually one of the easiest fixings to get off.

Like the front, the through-bolts at the rear are often seized solid to the arm bushes, after bashing them and heating them it’s time to just cut them out.

Thinking of having a go?

You’ll need to be a top level DIYer with access to some decent tools, a good vice and/or press, angry grinder, drills, heat, small chisels and a fair amount of time. The bushes themselves are bonded to the arms so require a combination of drilling, chiselling and even burning out so plan ahead if your car is a daily and get the swear box out, it really is a pig of a job if you’ve never done them before.

I sell and recommend Powerflex for the job, yes they are expensive, but they’re good quality and will tell you how stiff their bushes are, this is known as the ‘Shore rating’. You’ll need the black ones for the suspension. If you’re thinking of using any other brand make note how they don’t give you this important number on the screen so ask for it. What you will find is that some aftermarket bushes are actually more flexible or no better than the ones you are removing, this is because they use a lot of Polyurethane and less metal content than the originals, metal is very stiff right? Of course it is 🙂 Powerflex also use stainless steel for the crush tubes, so seizure is a thing of the past and they are guaranteed for life. We can discuss discounts if you want to purchase a reasonable amount at one time.

Setting the geometry

So many people bang on about their Hunter alignment these days as if the car drove much better because it’s been done by a Hunter and a laser.

How well your car is set up is solely down to the guy doing it not the equipment! That’s a sure fact.

The Hunter is a fantastic piece of kit and the main advantage is its adaptability and speed, the disadvantage is it’s obscene purchase price. An idiot can then mess things up faster and easier if you let him.

If you’re simply setting the toe angles to average road settings then generally you don’t have to pull the seized bolts from the bushes. What you will find is because it only needs a little tweak to get it right the now worn rubber bush will twist within itself to allow a setting. I know it’s not 100% correct, but inevitably it is what happens and is just about good enough to keep an old snotter on the road for a bit.

• 

Obviously when you’re reassembling everything will be blathered in grease won’t it? Of course it will, shame Mazda never did, but that’s life. If you have a later car and/or one which you intend to hang onto for a while it can be worth your while to pull all these bolts out now, grease them and put them back in, make sure you mark off the alignment on the discs and frame before you attempt anything with a paint mark, dot punch, chisel etc.

So ends another blog, hope you enjoyed or learned something from it, you can leave a comment or questions over there somewhere 🙂

Prices for bushes here: http://www.duratecnc.co.uk/?page_id=35

An often talked about subject in the NC community, especially in Autumn/Winter.

They tend to last roughly about 40k miles, that’s very, very roughly as there is no exact point where they fail, the rubber seals distort, go hard or shrink and begin to pass a bit of water when they shouldn’t and gradually get worse over time.

I think most people realise that the ‘stat is an important part of the engine, it ensures it gets up to temperature quickly and that is stays at that ideal (minimum) temp too. Don’t ever think a cool engine is a happy engine, it is certainly not – but then neither is an overheated one either. Engines are happy at around 85 to 95’c. This where the oil viscosity is at its best and economy is good due to ideal fuel burn characteristics. Engine oil contains contaminants such as moisture, fuel and other byproducts, when the oil gets hot they evaporate off and are sucked out. This is one of the reasons why cars which are only used for short journeys need their oil changing more regularly.

Deciding whether your car’s ‘stat is faulty is relatively simple, even though the temperature gauge (as previously discussed) isn’t very accurate and in warmer weather we don’t use the heater so it often only gets diagnosed in Autumn and Winter.

Using an OBD reader which measures the real temperature will help, but also take a look at your gauge before you start the engine for the first time that day, the needle should move from there within 3 (Summer) to 5 (Winter) minutes of driving it. When the engine has been running for at least 10 mins the heater should be blowing warm, after 20 mins fully hot, if you’re driving down the motorway on a cold day with the heater on and it starts to blow a bit cooler than it was then that’s a sure sign it’s failing. Don’t perform any tests with it idling.

Changing it is fiddly, but easy enough with the correct tools. There were two types, long hose fitting (later models) and short hose fitting (early models), it doesn’t matter which you buy, they both fit as the rubber hoses move to take up the difference. We sell high quality Mahle brand for £20.

Is the wrong answer 🙂

In defence of the cheap MX-5 as a base for a track car…..

I suppose this also could be about thinking you can buy and run a cheap MX5 and not spending anything on it.

Many people think it’s better to spend £6k on a £10k car, rather than £6k on a £2k car. So our two examples for this article are at two extremes – the modified £8k ’06 and the equally modified £16k 2012 car.

We hear and read “I’m not spending that on it! it’s only worth £xxx” all the time, I guess that’s one way of looking at it, here is another.

Whilst there are very good reasons to start with the best and latest example you can find, If you’re building a track car there is also a strong case to start with something cheap – as long as the rust hasn’t taken it’s toll on the external upper bodywork or gone too far underneath.

With any serious track car, you’re going to throw out so much stuff that (snobbery aside) it often doesn’t really matter what you started out with. They’re both going to need the engine, the suspension bushes, original coilovers, wheels, air-con and various other bits throwing out and replacing.

“Aha!” Says £16k man, “but my car has the later stronger engine!” It is a very good point too, lets look at that in detail. The pistons are essentially the same strength (and CR), the rods are ‘proper’ traditionally forged steel, the crank is steel as opposed to the earlier cast iron one and it has improved valve springs fitted which will cope better at high rpm. Ultimately it is the better engine up to a point. Did anyone ever say ‘Hey I broke my cast iron NC crank?’ No, they never did, also as cast iron is less dense than forged steel it’s actually 1.4 kg lighter too. That is a big saving in a place like that.

The valve springs and rods were also a worthwhile mod and we sell the springs for a few quid, if you’re putting big high lift cams in you’ll need different extra higher lift springs anyhow. If you’re ditching the engine for a bigger one, none of this matters.

There are a few reasons why the later models got a forged crank:

1. The main and the most interesting one is that an engine with a steel crank is slightly smoother and quieter – it has less NVH (Noise, vibration & harshness). Whether noticeable or not to your average driver I don’t know, but it is there and engine designers do site it as a reason.

2. Every new model has to be better than the last to get people to buy it. Selling cars is about making money, end of story. If Mazda bought in a job lot of different spec engine parts which added £200 to the cost of the car, they could charge the customer another £2k for them.

3. As the model got older, racing series were springing up to accommodate the NC, racers want racer parts…..

As discussed previously if there is rust showing on the upper bodywork then just walk away. The favourite starting spot underneath is the rear of the cill where it meets the wheel arch and this is easily remedied. If you buy a late model (previously stored outside) NC then you’ll still have to do some kind of remedial work underneath to prevent it getting worse as it’ll have surface rust all over it.

So we take our two equally modified cars to the trackday or even a road trip; the £8k ’06 and the £16k 2012. Who will be going the quickest? Well theoretically they’ll be both the same as they’ve both had the same mods done to them.

However in practice maybe the older car will be going faster, the reason for this is the £8k guy has less to lose so is pushing the limits further. His car is also lighter due to the rust, no I can’t write that. The £8k guy also has more money to spend on further modifications so a couple of grand more and he’ll be going even quicker, still for less money. He’ll also have a warm glow all over and be sniggering like Muttley as he keeps up with, or beats £16k guy with his £8k car.

If you do have an accident which is repairable then NC1 parts are much cheaper and plentiful than NC2 and 3. These later models are only ever scrapped if they’ve been in an accident meaning lots of damaged panels, early cars are sold off cheap or broken up due to engine failures or corrosion.

It’s not all about where you start, it’s more about where you end up. All our track and test cars are based on the cheapest, but solid cars I can find. As long as i’m fast and safe I don’t care what the snobs say, as long as I can snigger like Muttley when i’m overtaking you 🙂

If you own an MX5 derived 2.0 engine and aren’t interested in all this technical gubbins then you just need to know you’ve got the one with good flowing ports; they never put a bad head on a 2ltr NC engine.

If you’re reading this as a non MX5 owner or are doing an engine swap and need to know more about heads then make yourself a brew and read on, I try to make it easy to understand for the average Petrolhead, but it’s difficult for me to judge the possible gulf between my knowledge and yours so bear with me. Similarly if you want to know whether to get your head ported or not then we’ll get to that later too.

As far as the N/A (naturally aspirated) engines are concerned all the exhaust ports, exhaust and inlet valves are the same, however there are 3 different shapes of inlet port. It’s been debated for many years, but no-one has ever gone publicly into too much depth about it.

Whenever I encounter a new head that i’m going to be doing a few of I study it in quite some detail and spend many hours with it on the flowbench getting to know what works and what doesn’t. A flowbench is just one of many tools which help an engine builder create a picture of the engine because once you’ve understood it, then you can start to modify it.

The bench does more than just give you a CFM figure, with the right additional equipment you can also check velocity, flow bias, disruption etc. Velocity yeah, how many people consider how important that is whilst waving their cock around with their big CFM figures as if that’s all that matters?

Real porting is about changing the shape of the ports, it isn’t about smoothing and polishing the walls. For various reasons the engine does not want smooth polished ports, it needs a rough finish. Think about it, the engine manufacturer sets up a mould to cast thousands and thousands of heads from. If they wanted a smooth port finish they would have made it smooth, but they didn’t. Anyone who polishes an inlet port is clown.

I’ve been doing head flow development and porting heads for many years now, so much so I’ve got nerve damage in my fingers from holding a grinder for so long. The first time I saw a Duratec head I thought yeah, they REALLY knew what they were doing here, it’s an automotive work of art. All the features we’ve been creating as much as possible to old heads over the decades are there already.

Perfect short side radius? Check. Well formed splitter? Yep. Min CSA ratio matches valve throat? Of course. Strengtheners in the bowl to prevent cracking on an overheated head, D shape over the SSR, 3 angle seats, lightweight valves with thin stems, a hump in the middle of the SSR to divide the flow around the valve stem, well formed bosses cast around the valve guide; the list goes on. Someone with a CNC mill or a hand held grinder will go in and plough all these features out in the wink of an eye. The valves will flap around in the shortened worn guides that they couldn’t be bothered to replace, never seat properly and wear prematurely, but because they smoothed everything out, got 20 likes on FB and told you they’ve put a 3 angle seat on you’ll think they’re great.

Here’s a thing; if I took a grinder (only) to a port, re-shaped it here and there and bolted it onto an engine we’d see a power increase. If your average customer saw it they’d say ‘wtf is that i’m paying for? It looks like a dog has chewed it’. The customer thinks he knows what the engine wants; lovely smooth polished ports. The engine on the other hand doesn’t give a toss what it looks like, it just wants airflow and properly homogenised fuel/air. So we finish the ports off to satisfy the customer and charge them accordingly, they post pics on FB and get 30 likes, job done.

Port molds are one of the tools I use to get an idea of what i’m looking at, If you don’t spot relevant features simply by looking into a port, you’ll see them on a mold. Here are the various parts of a port labelled, but I generally refer to the ‘short turn radius’ as the short side radius (SSR) and the area opposite it below the valve seat (shown here as long or back wall) the bowl.

What isn’t marked on there is an important feature called the minimum cross sectional area or Min CSA. Also known as the choke point this is one of the main governing parts of the port, the other being (aside from valve lift) the valve throat, remember this, it’s very important.

The Non VVT 1S7G and 3S7G head found on low powered Duratecs such as the Focus, all 1.8 engines and some Mazda 6 are to be avoided if a good port shape with equally good flow is desired, it cannot be improved upon to the same shape as the 3S4G (2.3) 6M8G (2.0) & L5 (2.5) which are found on the VVT engines. The ports have been given the label ‘High port’ and ‘low port’ years ago and we’ll stick with that, no point in trying to change things now and it’s difficult to describe them in a handy to use term as you will see below. The reason it doesn’t flow as well is quite apparent when you look at these molds. Low port is on the left, high port on the right.

As you can see the low port has no SSR or bowl. These two features are solely responsible for its lack of flow as they are very important parts of a port and help turn the air. I haven’t spent much time on it as it’s a non starter as far as power is concerned, but it looks like a tumble port which is good for economy and low rpm performance.

When designing or porting a head there are a lot of criteria to be met and the unwary can really mess things up with a grinder, but one thing stands out over all the rest and it is the fact we are trying to get the air to turn a corner losing as little mass flow and velocity as possible.

You can liken this to a car taking a corner at speed, if you try to perform a sharp 90 degree left at high speed you won’t make it and the car will simply skid straight on. If the angle of the corner is lessened, lets say to a large radius or two 45 degrees then you stand a better chance of making it round at the same speed. Air flow behaves in much the same way – the greater the radius, the more chance it has of hanging on and getting round without undue turbulence which slows it down. Now you know that apply it to the picture above.

Taking the above into account there is something else to be wary of. That is people who think they can flow test at 10″ of test pressure and scale it up accurately to 28″ or more. Air is heavier than you think, if it makes it round the SSR at 10″ it may not at higher test pressures when it’s flowing faster. This is quite easy for me to prove, I can test at 10″ and scale it up, or ‘correct it’ to 28″ (multiply by 1.670), record that figure. Then switch some more motors on (I have a 6 motor bench) and actually test at a real 28″. Do the new test figures equal the calculated figures? No sir they do not. Do major car manufacturers test at 10 or 28″? Nope. The higher the test pressure, the closer to real life you will be and the more accurate your figures will be too.

So what of the 2.5 head?

Often touted around as the one to have and has massive ports, huge flow you’ll be surprised to learn it actually isn’t all that and many people were duped into buying one. Some people will even tell you it has bigger valves! Only the port entry is larger, but it soon reduces down to the same SSR and Min CSA. It flows slightly more as a bare head on the ‘bench, but then in reality are we driving around with no intake manifold? Well of course not. Bolt that back on and test it again, you see the flow figures are then equal.

It does give the ready made advantage of taking large diameter throttle bodies for high power/RPM use though, but then a 2.0 or 2.3 can be enlarged in just the same way in a few minutes.

Most 2.5 swap guys go to ridiculous lengths to blend their old 2.0 intake into the new bigger port. It’s a complete waste of time because the restriction is in the inlet manifold, not the entrance to the port. I’ve bolted all combos onto the flow bench and it doesn’t make a difference.

This where you get duped – most flowbench owners show you the CFM figures with a bare head only, never with everything bolted to it as it would be in real life.

It’s all about what power level you are at, as pointed out earlier the controlling parts of a port are the valve (throat) and lift, the Min CSA and the SSR so whilst they stay the same so will the flow – and it does.

The reason the 2.5 has a wider entry is to match the bigger diameter runners of course, these are used to slow down the velocity and weaken the intake pulses flattening the torque curve and making the engine less peaky. Exactly what you want in a van or heavy four door saloon of course which is why Mazda did it, it’s behaviour is very much like a diesel engine. Is this a bad thing? No, it’s just a different thing, you or I have to decide what kind of personality we want the engine to have and specify it accordingly – or just dump it in as is, no problem with doing that. 30ft/lbs more of torque and good economy? Yeah i’ll take some of that.

CNC porting

Having a CNC ported head does not mean the end result is any better whatsoever. A head had to be ported and developed by hand in the first place for the CNC machine to copy it. Porting is hard work end of story. If you can get a machine to do it for you then it’s going to save you time and also wear and tear on the human body. You can mess a head up repeatedly without having to leave your office with a CNC machine! Many do, lazy programming and the need for that all important CFM figure (sic) can remove many of the important port features without giving it a second thought. Copying a well modified head though with a CNC machine and yeah, now we’re talking.

So should you get your head ported?

It really depends on what power output you are looking for. Other engines from earlier eras had ports which didn’t have a fantastic shape to them so could be modified if you knew what you were doing. The modern car market is very competitive, you absolutely can not afford to leave power and economy on the table by putting a poor engine (with bad ports) in a car. The ports on Duratecs can be lightly modified to flow a little bit more whilst retaining the same valve sizes, but not a lot. You’re wasting your time and money trying to get it to flow much more whilst retaining the same valve size as Mazda got the ratios right from the start. Increase the port size and the next restriction is the valve throat, so next on the list is bigger valves, then you can port the heads a bit more aggressively.

If modified appropriately the 2.5, 2.3 and 2.0 heads flow enough for 300bhp and more without forced induction. As a rough rule I would say (N/A) that up to around 200bhp you’ll be ok on standard ports. 220 – 240 lightly modded ports, 250 onwards you’ll need bigger valves with associated porting. As you can see there is no cut off point, it’s just a gradual reduction the further you go and of course it’s highly dependent on other mods.

As far as forced induction is concerned then 500bhp is easily achievable without getting the grinder out, pushing it further than that and i’d be looking at bigger valves with some porting.